Sunningdale, 15-16 September 2007

And so another 4NCL season begins in division two. The new league structure coming in for 2008-9 means there are four promotion spots into the top flight, with no relegations. In light of our recent near-miss, fighting against the big boys next year should be the least of our aims.

The summer saw our usual dip into the transfer market, trying to find cover for the irreplaceable Merim, Olena and Dave Scott, who have moved to pastures new. This has involved boosting our X chromosome count by recruiting Sophie Tidman and Heather Lang, to add to our existing female contingent of Lateefah and Maria. Most importantly though, a gaggle of new young blood (Matthew Daggitt, Georgs Vikanis, Marcus Harvey and James Foster) has joined our ranks. Whilst these signings may not raise our chances of winning the league, building our third team around talented local youngsters gives them a chance to play some “serious” chess (provided they avoid playing Sean…) and is undoubtedly an investment for our teams’ future.

Sat v Poisoned Pawns

OXFORD 1 5-3 POISONED PAWNS 1
1 w Savage, Ben D 2335 1 - 0 Swanson, Stephen 2248
2 b White, Michael J R 2246 0 - 1 Morgan, Ben 2233
3 w Rose, Matthew 2233 1 - 0 Dunn, Andrew 2204
4 b Rawlinson, Aidan 2221 ½ - ½ Dargan, Paul 2185
5 w Shaw, David A 2219 1 - 0 Byway, Paul 2167
6 b Smallbone, Kieran 2216 ½ - ½ Rosen, Daniel B 2127
7 w Eckersley-Waites, Tom 2186 0 - 1 Dignam, Matthew 2122
8 b Messam-Sparks, Lateefah 1924 1 - 0 default

The build-up to our first match of the season was an interesting one. Eight of us had recently been away on our near-annual chess holiday, this time choosing to sample copius amounts of tapas and sangria at an open in Barcelona. Mike played some blinding chess and came away with a thoroughly-deserved IM norm. Our perennial top board Ben, despite scoring the same 6/10, did it against much weaker opposition, including his picking up just one point in rounds 2-6 against players averaging just over 2050. The threats of his giving up chess were soon to follow, but fortunately my refusal to return his subs for this season convinced him to carry on playing 4NCL, if nothing else.

On the basis of his recent form, Mike was thrust as far up the board order as possible. Ben kept his board one slot by virtue of the 80 point rule. Things may be different once the October rating list is released – it's not clear Ben will even have a higher rating than soon-to-be-2300 Mike. And Mike, unlike two of our other unmentionable squad members isn't “too cool for school” when it comes to claiming the FM title…

As it turned out, normal order was restored and Barcelona Ben was banished to the history books, beating Steve Swanson's hedgehog in fairly typical Ben fashion – winning without, it seemed, really doing anything of note.

Mike had what looked like rather a miserable game, never really getting anything for his Benko pawn. It was entirely the opposite of what we saw from him in Barcelona, where Mike regularly tempted strong opposition into saccing material before squashing any ideas of compensation they might have.

Matt took his usual approach to 4NCL: turn up, win, go home, this time in his pet line in the Panov. Personally I think the line doesn't offer much (as Matt himself admitted after the game), but he stole a pawn, then another, then won the ensuing ending. I think him and Ben are on a mission to prove that, unlike what the rest of us might believe, chess is in fact very easy.

Aidan “did an Aidan”. For those of you unfamiliar with his current style of play, this involves playing black, playing a solid opening, knowing the theory and easily holding a draw. Occasionally his opponents lose their patience and do something un-solid when Aidan instead wins.

Dave won a Sicilian by playing d2-d4xc5-c6 and a2xb3-b4-b5, the marriage of pawns proving unstoppable. Dave seems to have really picked up the pace in recent times, and I reckon that by this time next year he'll have breached the magical 2300 barrier. You heard it here first…

Tom “did a Kieran”. For those of you unfamiliar with my current style of play, this involves dropping pieces for no compensation with alarming regularity.


Eckersley-Waites - Dignam
13 Qg4?? Qxd4 0-1

Oops. Tom was a star performer last year, so we'll let him off for this minor lapse. To make him feel better, here's the master at work with three big blunders from the 4NCL last season (yes, three in the same season, I know…), in increasing order of stupidity.


Alfred - Smallbone (rd 11)
16... Rxb2?? 17 Rc8 1-0


Punnett - Smallbone (rd 6)
45... Ke6??? 46 Re7+ (1-0, 74)


Adams - Smallbone (rd 2)
30... Rb8???? 31 Bxb8 1-0

With Lateefah picking up a broken-down-car related default, the remaining game of the day was mine, a rare excursion into the world of hardcore theory. Well sort of. My preparations for the game against Dan Rosen went so far as to have a look through our most recent 4ncl encounter, one I managed to win cutely in 25 moves. He recreated the first fifteen moves of that game; slowly, as though they were all new to him. Just as I started to imagine we might make a carbon copy, he noticed a deep stench of deja vu in he air and bailed into an alternative (albeit still rubbish) line. I proceeded to slowly ruin my position, miss a bankrank mate, then hold a bad ending. Luckily for the team, the match was fairly comfortably ours despite this topsy-turvy game.

Rosen - Smallbone (2005)

1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.exd5 cxd5 4.c4 Nf6 5.c5 e6 6.Nf3 Be7 7.Nc3 0-0 8.Be3 b6 9.b4 Ne4 10.Rc1 f5 11.Bf4 g5 12.Bxb8 Rxb8 13.Ne5 Nxc3 14.Rxc3 bxc5 15.Nc6 Qd6

16.Nxb8 cxd4 17.Qxd4 Bf6 18.Qxf6 Rxf6 19.Rxc8+ Rf8 20.Rxf8+ Kxf8 21.Na6

… and White's offside pieces are no match for the queen 21...Qe5+ 22.Kd2 Qb2+ 23.Ke3 d4+ 24.Kd3 Qc3+ 25.Ke2 d3+ 0-1

Rosen - Smallbone (2007)

16.Nxe7+(TN!) Qxe7 17.bxc5 Qc7 18.Bd3 Qf4 19.Qd2 Qxd4 20.Qxg5+ Kh8 21.Qc1 e5 22.0-0 f4 23.Be2 Bf5 24.Qa3 Qd2 25.Bh5 Rg8 26.g3 Rb2 27.c6 Bh3

28.Rd3 failing to fall for the cheapo 28.Qe7? Qxf2+! 28...Qb4? but this is just a bad ending. It was time to bail out with 28...Qc2 29.Rc3 Qd2 etc 29.Qxb4 Rxb4 30.Re1 d4 31.Rxe5 Rc8 32.Rd5?? Rb1+ 33.Rd1 Rxd1+ 34.Bxd1

34...Rxc6?? Oops 34...Re8 devours the d1-bishop 35.Rxd4 Rc1 36.f3 fxg3 37.hxg3 Be6 38.Kf2 Bxa2 39.Rd8+ Kg7 40.Rd7+ Kg6 41.Rxa7 Rxd1 42.Rxa2

42...Rd3 I was most impressed with Tom's knowledge of how to hold this “theoretically drawn” ending. Pawn on h5, king on h6, rook on g6 apparently. I unconfidently went my own way… 43.Ke2 Rb3 44.Rd2 h5 45.Rd3 Rb5 46.Ke3 Kf5 47.Rc3 Ra5 48.Kd4 h4 49.gxh4 Kf4 50.Rc5 Ra4+ 51.Kd5 Kxf3 52.h5 Rh4 ½-½

Sun v White Rose

WHITE ROSE 5½-2½ OXFORD 1
1 w Teplitsky, Jan 2451 ½ - ½ Savage, Ben D 2335
2 b Gourlay, Iain 2347 1 - 0 White, Michael J R 2246
3 w Kaid, Almar 2271 ½ - ½ Shaw, David A 2219
4 b Barrett, Steve J 2219 0 - 1 Eckersley-Waites, Tom 2186
5 w Gayson, Peter M 2232 1 - 0 Rawlinson, Aidan 2221
6 b Adams, David M 2234 1 - 0 Hackett, David G 2163
7 w Corke, Anya 2149 ½ - ½ Smallbone, Kieran 2216
8 b Burnett, Jim 2190 1 - 0 Messam-Sparkes, Lateefah 1924

Last season, White Rose outgunned us on paper, but we managed to turn them over with a strong performance from the middle order. This season they turned up with a slightly stronger team, us with a slightly weaker team and it proved too much. It was a match we never really looked like competing for and, save Aidan's board, all the results were justified.

Ben held his strong opponent without breaking sweat. His IM opponent played like he'd never seen a chess-board before, using most of his time up whilst the move-numbers were still in single figures (Saturday night on the tiles anyone?!). In the end, queens and other bits came off and both players were satisfied with the outcome.

Mike had another bad day at the office. It was one of those Kings Indians that I trouble to understand: minor pieces distributed randomly around the board from moves 10 to 30. A bit of mental arithmetic at move 32 showed that Mike had one less of them, so 0-1.

Dave S played like a 2300.

Tom “did a Tom”. For those of you unfamiliar with his usual style of play, this involves showing comtempt for material whilst launching pieces towards his opponents king. This strategem is particularly honed toward White-side-of-Sicilian bashes and, whilst the computer might think otherwise, for the crowd the result was never in doubt.

Aidan had a most miserable game. This was a Svesh (an opening I understand even less than the Kings Indian) and another random-piece-distribution moment occured in the centre of the board. Aidan's opponent lost an exchange and a bit, and our lad seemed well on the road to victory. But then White's knights started hopping to squares pulled out of a hat, one eventually landing on e3, forking Black's rook on g4 and bishop on f1…

Dave H's game wasn't much fun. His queen went for an early morning stroll, only to end up playing a rugby game where she was the ball [I need to do some work on my metaphors]. All over in 15 moves, though Dave struggled on for 30.

I was up against one of those up-and-coming young types. It was a Tromp-thing, though ended up looking like a French. Now I don't think I've ever ventured a French, but guessed it was all about challenging White's pawn chain with f6 and not letting White keep control of e5…

Mission failed. Or so it seemed. Here she offered me a draw, based I think on her nervousness of being inside the final ten minutes. I gladly took it, believing my position strategically up the creek. The computer of course guffawed at my decision; rather than ½-½ here, I've got 23...Bxe5 (huh?) 24.Nxe5 Nc6 (ah - embarassing the g6 bishop) 25.Bxe8 Nxe5 26.Bxa4 Ng4 27.Rd2 and everything looks like it's holding together until 27...Ne3! What I'd give for that extra ply.

Finally, Lateefah was up against it, carrying a 250 rating point deficit into the game. Her opponent showed little mercy and took advantage of her awkward piece placement to snaffle the point before she'd had time to castle.


All in all. One out of two, ain't so bad. Next time round we're up against Guildford 3 and South Wales Dragons (third and fourth, respectively, in the table). Major objectives being:

  1. Win both matches
  2. Find a new roving reporter…

Kieran