
Sunningdale in leafy, stockbroke-y Berkshire … In former times, the house (above) was the location for the conclusion of a Northern Ireland peace agreement in December 1975 – an unusual, not to mention faintly farcical arrangement, which left many an Irishman of that time assuming that Sunningdale was just another posh house the other side of the border – “area don’t you know, somewhere near Stormont” sums it up.
So, an “imagine-my-surprise” air follows this writer to this particular venue each time the 4NCL circuit pays a visit – and, come to think of it, where and who better than chess players to continue the arcane practice of dodgy signatures on frankly dubious accounts of what may or may not have happened?! And so, it was to here that the UK chess world* gravitated en masse in mid January for Rounds 6 and 7, and with the above in mind that one reads the following account of proceedings…
(*except Dave Bruce, who was sipping champagne in Birmingham and listening to Chess FM coverage of Corus 2009. And, of course, the participants at Corus 2009. And perhaps some others.)
So, that much scenery being enough to allow the players to skip through their opening repertoires, and with thanks to Kevin Henbest for a pleasant trip in bright sunshine from central Oxford, we arrived in good time at 4.20pm for the post-openings phase to find 8 Oxford heads-a-thinking, 7 brows-a-furling (etc) … as nobody seemed to be carving out an advantage that would be obvious to the passing 1850 FIDE-rated player. Or so our first text to Birmingham suggested:
4.20pm: FIRST IMPRESSIONS: we seem to be bad (or dubious) in two (Tim and Sophie), good in one (Aidan) and equals (plus) in the remainder. Kevin thinks Tim is better for instance. I thought Tom E-W game in flux until he played exf5 when either he is “fluxed” or I need new glasses. A lot of huddling over the boards, and less walking and talking. Kieran maybe better, a pawn up but in a hairy endgame - Ben making no great progress but a pawn up with opposite bishops and rooks.
So, not one for panicking in other people’s chess game trouble, after a coffee (£2 for a cup, as many refills as the paper cup holds), we settled in for a more leisurely kibitz:
These positions had already come and gone by 4.20pm, with Sophie dropping an exchange in highly visual circumstances against the youthful Alan Merry, while Tim’s opponent bottles out and returns a piece with castling – is 15. … Nb8 plain madness or actually a quite clever blockade? So while Tim regains his piece, and maybe a pawn, the white king looks like he’s coming in for some clerical stick in the next few moves.
Merry – Tidman (B) |
Dickinson – Bucknell (B) |
Meanwhile, Kieran’s position is now well advanced into the endgame phase at this early hour…
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Talsma – Smallbone (B)
Though Black is nominally a pawn to the good, someone does seem to have taken a corkscrew to their structure. Still, the knights look good and those queenside pawns are well-placed for a walk up the board. As against that, Black has to find something to play, in the now moment, as those king-side pieces look both draughty and undeveloped. Kieran decides he has a couple of g-pawns too many: 20. … Bc5 21.Rxg7 Rf8 22.Be4 Nbd3 23.Bxg6+ when Black is now a pawn light, and facing three passers on the king-side.
By 5.00pm, Sophie seems to be winning, with a lot of central pawns and two bishops the reward for some canny on-board wriggling. Tim looks dodgy still, but as Mr Mojo says, that’s par for the course. Elsewhere Ben and Mike have better endgames but opposite bishops; Kieran’s activity and play continues to the tune of a pawn adrift. Dave Shaw has stodgy defence in prospect, and Aidan is OK but may be taking it TOO easy. Tom EW has 2 bishops but too many pawn islands for my liking.
A horrible thought surfaces: 4-all for a third time?!
Player – Eckersley-Waites |
Dickinson – Bucknell |

Onward to the 5.45pm update, where it seems that Sophie may be blowing up on 8?! Aidan turns screw on 7; Shaw has stodge pizza (6); Tim cooks spaghetti on 5 (= ?); Tom in spaghetti junction on 4 while riot of opposite bishops on top 3 means all to play for.
Back to Merry – Tidman, which has ebbed, flowed and generally had the crowd scratching all parts of its anatomy, but which ends in a flurry of opportunity, and time trouble, and drama:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Merry – Tidman
White to move
36.Nxe5? not obvious in time trouble perhaps but 36.Qf6+ Kh7 37.Qg5 wins for White (+15.37) 36...e2 Chessbase Lite suggests … Kh7 which Fritz 8 suggests might be equal. 37.Re1? 37.Rxf7+ mates in 4 for White 37...c2 Here White offers a draw out of turn. Oddly, and rather than ask, White thrusts a hand out (as if resigning) and then says “Draw”? Sophie asks for a move. 38.Nc6 Black accepts draw – when Fritz suggests 38. ... Qxe1! and 39 ... Bf2! is probably winning for Black.

Merry,A - Tidman,S [E32] 4NCL, Saturday, 17.01.2009
1.d4 e6 2.c4 Nf6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.Qc2 0-0 5.e4 d6 6.Bd3 h6 7.Nge2 Nbd7 8.f3 c5 9.d5 Qc7 10.Bd2 a6 11.Nf4 Ne5 12.a3 Ba5 13.0-0 b5 14.cxb5 c4 15.Be2 axb5 16.b4 Bb6+ 17.Kh1 Qd7 18.a4 bxa4 19.Nxa4 Bd4 20.Nb6 Bxb6 21.Rxa8 Qb7 22.Raa1 g5 23.Nh3 exd5 24.f4 gxf4 25.Bxf4 Nxe4 26.Bxe5 dxe5 27.Bf3 Bf5 28.Qc1 Kg7 29.Qe1 Bd4 30.Ra3 c3 31.Qh4 Qxb4 32.Ra6 Bg6 33.Bxe4 dxe4 34.Nf2 e3 35.Ng4 h5 36.Nxe5 e2 37.Re1 c2 38.Nc6 ½-½
6.00 Time control and time to start counting: Aidan crush then Tim D snap mates and Sophie draws ("probably lost but so winning earlier") looks good and brings us to 2.5 points but Dave's Stodge turns to Shit City and two draws on top boards leaves us at 3.5 with two to play. Then Tom EW gives up ghost but fortunately Mike White wheedles a piece up on move 40.
Will Mike White's B, N and 1 win against Mark Gray's opposite B and one!? Tune in next week on the same Batty channel...
Aidan’s crush – the end phase is fairly savage, with Black blundering as he found himself without many better alternatives…
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Rawlinson – Gregory
26.exd6 Qxd6 27.Nxa5 cxd4? 28.Nb7+ 1-0
A nice way to break a win-duck that seems to have plagued Aidan at the 4NCL.
Rawlinson,A - Gregory [B07] 4NCL, Saturday, 17.01.2009
1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Be3 c6 5.Qd2 b5 6.Bd3 b4 7.Nce2 Qb6 8.h3 Ba6 9.Nf3 Bxd3 10.cxd3 Qb5 11.0-0 Na6 12.a4 Qb7 13.Bh6 Kd7 14.Bf4 h6 15.d5 c5 16.Rfe1 Bg7 17.Nc1 g5 18.Bg3 Nc7 19.Nb3 Nh5 20.Bh2 a5 21.Rac1 Qb6 22.d4 Na6 23.e5 Rac8 24.Qd3 Kd8 25.Qe4 Nf4 26.exd6 Qxd6 27.Nxa5 cxd4 28.Nb7+ 1-0
Meanwhile things were turning our way on two other boards:
White – Gray |
Dickinson – Bucknell |
Score: 3 ½ - 3 ½ with Mike’s game to conclude…
6.45pm So it's K, N and B v K for the match... Mike certainly knows how to crank up the tension, having made no attempt to queen his remaining b-pawn and gone straight to the B+N V solo King ending. So it was time so hold on to seats to witness what result White (White) would achieve against former Oxford Univ CC president, Mark Gray (Black). A small small contingent grouped around the table to see if a BCF 2250 player could or could not finish off his opponent.

but as things transpired, the vultures soon had to go find their own grub – not all that easy in posh Sunningdale – for Mike was up to the job:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
White – Gray
60.Ke5 Kg4 61.Be3 Kf3 62.Nd5 Kg4 63.Ke4 Kg3 64.Nf6 Kg2 65.Nh5 Kh3 66.Kf3 Kh2 67.Ng3 Kh3 68.Bg1 Kh4 69.Ne4 Kh3 70.Ng5+ Kh4 71.Kf4 Kh5 72.Kf5 Kh4 73.Bf2+ Kh5 74.Bg3 Kh6
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
75.Ne6 Kh5 76.Ng7+ Kh6 77.Kf6 Kh7 78.Kf7 Kh6 79.Bf4+ Kh7 80.Nh5 Kh8 81.Bh6 Kh7 82.Bf8 Kh8 83.Bg7+ Kh7 84.Nf6# 1-0
After which there was plenty of time to go for a quiet pint, check the internet, iron a shirt, or whatever took your fancy before heading out for a Pizza Express meal, edited highlights of which follow:

and a quick return to the hotel bar was favoured once the rumour spread in the back of Ben’s car that after Match of the Day might follow “GM wannabes watching porn on the big screen”, but hopes of action (football or otherwise) were dashed by experience – how dull was Chelsea – Stoke, then? – and the evening was somewhat curtailed when the pub closed at midnight.
But not before the snooker doubles team-bonding exercises were concluded.

“Spot the Balls”

“good technique – Kieran stays down on the shot”

SUNDAY MATCH – 11.00am start
A restful morning spent repairing the stretched sinews of the night before the reporter concludes amongst other things that Sunday morning TV is complete and utter crap. Honestly, all those people smiling as they go from parish to parish wearing sou’westers and wellies and look at puppies paws and say how nice it is that the weather has stayed away. No offence, but shouldn’t the cameras stay away too?
Breakfast wasn’t half-bad though – and Aidan picked up the ‘my-cup-ain’t-half-full-it’s-overflowing’ cooked breakfast stacking award, while Sophie getting points for noticing the porridge, and Kieran managing to get 8 people to fit the table designed for eight. The hot topic of the day was discussed when Ben revealed the line-ups for the 11am start, viz:
“How come we posted our team 24 hours early on the internet, Kieran?”*
*(Matt Rose gets a crackerjack pencil for observation)
and people wandered off in search of databases around 10am, although in fairness Poisoned Pawns and Oxford are like (as they say on Facebook) “like peas in a pod”, so hardly any need really.
Eventually it was time to check out, and since these rounds weren't live on the web - the only crowd facilities we found were these:

The analysis room
it was soon time to rejoin the fray in the tournament hall. Accordingly, and having having missed large chunks of opening theory, our first text to the Birmingham faithful went something like this:
12.30pm. After restful morning paparazzi arrives to find Oxford better on 3 already (Matt R, Dave and Aidan) with Mike and Sophie chugging away carefully. Tom has sacked an exchange in an ending while Kieran takes on Dan Rosen and in view of previous encounters between this pair and time trouble already being mooted as an issue (at move 11) fireworks expected while Ben ... ... actually, who knows - a Vienna ending, 2 bishops and no noticeable pawn structure...
Aidan on board 7 and facing a Rudd but not the Jack Rudd, quickly got to a demonstrably better position against 1. b4.
1.b4 d5 2.Bb2 Qd6 3.a3 a5 4.b5 e5 5.e3 c5 6.c4 d4 7.exd4 exd4 8.d3 Nf6 9.Be2 Be7 10.Nf3 0–0 11.0–0 h6
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
And, having started so well with 1. b4, one has to wonder where it has all gone wrong for White. Maybe Aidan’s smooth moves got him rattled, and he felt obliged to put all his pawns on white squares and defend them with his bishop on e2, while allowing Aidan’s pawns to block off his recently fianchettoed bishop. Maybe, of course, 1.b4 is just really nonsense, but you can’t tell that to the current writer – at least, not until he’s got through the cold turkey that is called nicotine withdrawal. Aidan won efficiently and crisply by move 29.
Does anyone know, incidentally and apropos moves 3-8 above, what the longest series of pawn-only moves is in chess? I can’t find anything obvious on Tim Krabbé’s site.

Tom’s sacrifice of the exchange in the endgame will be in an endgame familiar to Oxford players who recall the end-of-season encounter Starkie – Eckersley-Waites from a couple of years back:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Byway – Eckersley-Waites
10.Na3 Ra5 11.Bc7 Rxa3 12.bxa3
after which the game starts to warm up a bit.
By 1.20pm the confident summary is:
- Ben seems to have found a position that isn’t in his book of surprises, and stops to think for 32 minutes.
- Tom meanwhile has improved his position against Paul Byway – at least regaining the exchange with advantage – but then stops for a while to sacrifice a piece for pawns to reach a bishop vs pawns ending. It seems that the success at the snooker table has gone to his head.
- Kieran seems to be aiming typos against the enemy king but these end up to be blank cartridges and a somewhat anodyne draw emerges. The post mortem reveals that the journalist is the main culprit, for having mentioned Pavlov’s dog in the middle of an offhand conversation on the way back from the coffee dock.
- Sophie though has been winning for some time in a hail of non-tactics in her battle on board 8.
Right, time to have a look at top board:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Swanson – Savage (B)
Where Ben took about 32 minutes over the diagrammed position (White has just played 18. b4, threatening c5) before play continued
18...c5 19.Nb3 Rxd1+ 20.Kxd1 c6 21.Nxc5 Rxe5.
It’s not entirely clear what the options here were, but later on Ben whispered “took 32 frigging minutes over a variation back there and my opponent doesn’t play it”. Still, it’s clear that an interesting pawn race is developing on the white queen- and the black king-side.
At the other end of the match, Mike was completing his 2nd win of the weekend a lot more quickly than the previous day’s marathon:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
White – Winfridsson (W)
White has taken quite a few risks to get to this position already but here he has options – Bf6, Ba4+ which compensate for the displaced king position (it’s not that vulnerable just now). Instead he fires in with an exchange to boot: 19.Rac1 Nxc1 20.Rxc1 Qd7 21.Bf6 Be7 (which was what I figured might be tried as a bail-out, even though White does seem to be better anyway) 22.Nxe5 Qd6 23.Bxe7 Qxe5?? (Even worse than the line of least resistance: Qxe7 was necessary even though it loses back the exchange) 24.Bf6 1–0
White,Michael - Winfridsson [B10] 4NCL Sunday, 18.01.2009
1.e4 c6 2.c4 d5 3.exd5 cxd5 4.cxd5 Nf6 5.Qa4+ Nbd7 6.Nc3 a6 7.Nf3 g6 8.Bc4 Rb8 9.d6 e6 10.d4 Bxd6 11.Qc2 b5 12.Bb3 Qc7 13.d5 e5 14.Bg5 b4 15.Ne4 Nxe4 16.Qxe4 Nc5 17.Qh4 Nd3+ 18.Kd2 Bf5 19.Rac1 Nxc1 20.Rxc1 Qd7 21.Bf6 Be7 22.Nxe5 Qd6 23.Bxe7 Qxe5 24.Bf6 1–0
By 1.50pm it’s 3-1 as draws (Kieran, Dave) complemented by mate on 8 (Sophie) add to Mike’s win. Meanwhile Aidan is about to annex key e-pawn, and with it the game.
and Matt’s advantage was still apparent just before time control, notwithstanding some careful defence by his opponent.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Rose – Harley (W)
38.Nb2 in the car afterwards, Matt thought this wasn’t the best, and considered instead 38.Nd6 as more to the point. Fritz doesn’t seem to mind either move; but here after say 38 … b5 39.g4 Kg8 40.Kg1 Kf8 41.Bf1 White is in control picks up the b-pawn 38...Ba6 39.Na4 not best. Instead, 39.c4 b5 when White can consider the luxury of either 40. Bf1 or 40. c5 39...Bb5 40.Nb6 Matt probably overlooked that after 40.Nc5 b6 the b6 pawn isn't immediately vulnerable. 40...Bc6 41.c4 Kg8 42.b5 Bxg2 43.Kxg2 Kf7 44.c5 Ke6 45.Kf3? blunders a pawn and leaves Matt with little other than a drawing plan. Nf5 46.Ke4 Nd4 47.f4 gxf4 48.gxf4 f5+ 49.Ke3 Nxb5 50.fxe5 Kxe5 51.Nc4+ Kd5 52.Na5 Kxc5 53.Nxb7+ Kc6 54.Kf4 ½–½
2.20pm Aidan closes out comfortably on board 7, his third piece foray beyond 4th rank on move 28 being enough to induce resignation next move: 4-1 with the top three boards to come. Tom is a piece for three pawns adrift; Matt still has a plus but nothing concrete while Ben ... looks too close to call any result

2.45pm It appears my “too close to call” call was off the mark, as on returning to the board, I found this position:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Swanson – Savage (W)
And there’s no practical way of stopping those black pawns short of: 34.Nxf4 Rxf4 35.Rxe3 Kc7 and now anything other than “White resigns” can be safely awarded a query mark 36.Kb2 Kb7 37.Rh3 Rf6 38.Kc3 Rf3+ 39.Rxf3 Bxf3 40.Kb4 0–1
So with the match result now secure, Tom’s game can be viewed with a greater sense of detachment. Here he seems to have a draw in hand unless the white rook can disturb the king-side pawns:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Byway – Eckersley-Waites (W)
Fritz gives this as broadly equal, which seems correct as long as White's rook remains inactive. But if rooks are exchanged how is the ending then? Both players rush to investigate this option: 26...Rd5 27.Re5 Rxe5 28.Bxe5 f6 29.Bf4 Kd5 30.Kf3 and here, it's hard to know whether to aim for blockade (... g5) or attack - but most would know Tom's preference here (Fritz seems to agree). 30...b5 31.a3 b4 32.cxb4 Kxd4 33.Be3+
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
And here who knows what’s happening. A brief review in the Vicky Arms last night after a club match suggests that all three results become possible in the course of what follows:
33...Kd5 Fritz says 33...Kc3 34.b5 Kc2 35.b6 c3 36.b7 d2 37.b8Q d1Q+ is better or winning for Black 34.Bd2 g6 35.Bc3 e5 36.h4 h5 37.gxh5 gxh5 38.Ke3 f5 38...Kc6 39.Ke4 Kd6 40.b5 Kc5 41.Bb4+ Kxb5 42.Kd5 and the Black pawns all fall down 39.b5 this seems to win... 39...e4 and here 40.b6 Kc6 41.Kd4 Kxb6 42.Bd2 wins for White 40.Kf4 Kc5
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
41.Bd2 this seems to lose...
- 41.b6 seems to draw: 41...Kxb6 42.Ke3 Kc5 43.Bb4+ Kd5 44.Bc3 Kd6 45.Kd4 Kd7 46.Bd2 Ke6 47.Bf4 c3 48.Kxc3 Kd5 seems to be drawing (Fritz);
- and better by far: 41.Ke3 Kxb5 42.Kd4 Kc6 43.Bd2 Kd6 44.Bf4+ wins
41...Kxb5 42.Kxf5 loses immediately but: 42.Ke3 c3 43.Bxc3 Kc4 44.Be5 Kb3 45.Bd6 Kc2 46.Bb4 is also hopeless 46...f4+ 42...e3 43.Bxe3 c3 44.Ke4 d2 0–1
Byway,Paul - Eckersley-Waites,Tom [D02], 4NCL Sunday, 18.01.2009
1.Nf3 d5 2.d4 Nf6 3.Bf4 c5 4.e3 Nc6 5.c3 Qb6 6.Qb3 c4 7.Qxb6 axb6 8.Be2 b5 9.0–0 Bf5 10.Na3 Ra5 11.Bc7 Rxa3 12.bxa3 e6 13.a4 bxa4 14.Ne5 Nxe5 15.Bxe5 Ne4 16.Rfc1 Ba3 17.f3 Bxc1 18.Rxc1 Nd2 19.Bf4 Bd3 20.Kf2 Kd7 21.e4 Nxe4+ 22.fxe4 dxe4 23.Bxd3 exd3 24.Rb1 Kc6 25.Re1 Rd8 26.g4 Rd5 27.Re5 Rxe5 28.Bxe5 f6 29.Bf4 Kd5 30.Kf3 b5 31.a3 b4 32.cxb4 Kxd4 33.Be3+ Kd5 34.Bd2 g6 35.Bc3 e5 36.h4 h5 37.gxh5 gxh5 38.Ke3 f5 39.b5 e4 40.Kf4 Kc5 41.Bd2 Kxb5 42.Kxf5 e3 43.Bxe3 c3 44.Ke4 d2 0–1

























